Tear It Down or Build It Up?
By: Diane Tuman, Content Manager | June 16, 2006
Teardowns, knockdowns, bash-and-builds vs. McMansions, pop-tops, and snout homes: It’s a war out there these days, as detailed in today’s New York Times article that would get anyone’s heart racing — even if you didn’t own a home.
What’s happening is that folks are buying homes and hoping to tear them down to rebuild bigger ones or take existing homes and morph them into McMansions, of sorts. Communities where this is happening such as Laguna Beach, Calif., Nantucket, Mass., and Ocean City, N.J., are putting their foot down and getting help from the National Trust for Historic Preservation to slow down the madness.
One funny anecdote in the article dealt with a real estate agent who was given the OK to build an addition to his home in Lewes, Del., but to make room, he needed to knock down a dilapidated chicken coop on the property that dated back to the 1800’s. Thinking it would be a slam-dunk to get the go-ahead in a public hearing he was met with fierce public disapproval and did not get the OK. The reason? It lent "value to the streetscape."
So, whenever you drive down the street and see a dilapidated building ready to fall over, a community ordinance could be protecting its right to stand there — albeit sloppily.
- Stumble it!
- Categories: Real Estate Industry, Zillow
Comments
3 Comments so far
Enjoy this post? Subscribe to the Zillow Blog feed or get updates via e-mail

chicken on June 19, 2006 10:57 am
save the chickens!
Diane on June 22, 2007 7:04 am
if I have property with a delapidated house on it, can I tear it down after building a new home on the property, and what would the payment be,do I still have to pay for the one I tore down? Or how does that work
Cher on September 27, 2007 6:49 pm
We are also hearing of communities where stricter building restrictions are being enforced, and significantly devaluing properties in the process. It’s hard to extract the maximum from the sale of a house that one can’t do much with.